← All writing

Shrinking number: HKU's non-Chinese-speaking student admissions

HKU posted its 2026 admissions results this week. Down near the bottom of the usual list of scholars, athletes and top scorers was one line: the university had admitted 33 local non-Chinese-speaking (NCS) students, the highest number among the eight UGC-funded universities.

That's the number HKU wants you to take away from it, and it's likely true. It's also a two-thirds fall from what the same press release said three years earlier, in 2023. I went back through every HKU admissions announcement I could find, from 2016 to now, checked the number against everything else I could get my hands on, and tried to answer one question honestly: should this worry anyone?

96 → 33
from the 2023 peak to this year: a 66% fall
8 of 10
years with a release available where HKU calls the number "the highest"
2017
the one year with no admissions press release I could find at all

The case for worry

Start with the shape of the decline, since that's the part that's hardest to explain away. Here's every figure I could confirm directly, plus 2015, which isn't stated anywhere but can be worked out: the 2016 release says that year's 57 was "an increase of 78% from last year," which implies 32.

0 50 100 32 2015 57 2016 n/a 2017 84 2018 64 2019 78 2020 63 2021 86 2022 96 peak 2023 48 2024 51 2025 33 2026 −66%
called "the highest"
not called "the highest" (2016, 2020)
estimated, not stated directly (2015)
no press release found (2017)

The two hatched years describe growth from the year before instead of ranking against other universities.

The swings here are large in both directions, historically: up 37% one year, down 50% the next, which on its own isn't a red flag; a cohort this size moves around a lot. What's harder to wave away is the shape since 2023 specifically: three straight years of decline, from a decade high straight to a decade low, with no single bad year to pin it on.

And here's the part that makes it worth flagging rather than shrugging off: none of HKU's own language would tip you off. Below is what each release actually says, next to the number.

Year NCS admitted YoY Change What the release says
2015 32 n/a not stated in a release; worked out from 2016's figure
2016 57 +78% framed as growth from the year before, not called "the highest"
2017 no data n/a no press release found for this year
2018 84 n/a called the highest among all universities
2019 64 −24% called the highest among all universities
2020 78 +22% framed as growth from the year before, not called "the highest"
2021 63 −19% called the highest among all local universities
2022 86 +37% called the highest intake among all local universities
2023 96 +12% called "the highest number among the eight funded universities"
2024 48 −50% ↑ identical wording
2025 51 +6% ↑ identical wording
2026 33 −35% ↑ identical wording

Shaded rows: the four years, in a row, that used the exact same sentence.

From 2023 on, that clause is identical across four separate releases in four separate years, with only the digit swapped. It doesn't matter whether the count went up (2025) or fell by half (2024); the sentence is the same either way. Only two years break the pattern: 2016 and 2020, both years when the count jumped from an unusually low prior year. In both, the release describes the change as growth from the year before instead of a ranking against other universities.

The claim that doesn't move. "Highest" is a comparison against seven other universities in a single year. It is not a comparison against HKU's own number the year before. Both things can be true at once: genuinely highest this year, and 66% smaller than three years ago, because the sentence is built to answer a different question than the one the year-by-year figures raise.

The case against panicking

Now the other side, because a two-thirds fall sounds worse in isolation than it might actually be.

Start with scale. We're talking about differences of a few dozen students a year. A shift of ten or fifteen NCS admissions, in either direction, produces a double-digit percentage swing purely from a small base. That's not a reason to ignore the pattern since 2023, but it is a reason to hold the individual year-to-year numbers loosely.

More importantly: I don't have the other seven universities' NCS admission numbers for each of these years. Taking HKU's "highest" claim at face value, which I do, it's still worth asking what it's highest against, because two very different pictures could sit behind that same claim. One: the other seven institutions' NCS intakes have also been falling (a shrinking HKDSE cohort, emigration, something else), in which case HKU staying highest while shrinking just reflects the whole sector contracting together, and this becomes a far less pointed story. Two: the other seven have been flat or rising, which would mean HKU's 63-student fall since 2023 got absorbed somewhere else in the system while HKU still out-admitted every one of them, every single year. I don't have the numbers to settle which of these it is, but the second one asks a lot: seven institutions quietly picking up the slack without any of them ever actually passing HKU's own, falling number. I wouldn't assume that's what happened without seeing it.

One thing that pushes toward not panicking yet: JUPAS's own published statistics show the total applicant pool (all applicants across all nine participating institutions, not broken out by NCS status) bottomed out around 39,000 between 2022 and 2024, then climbed to 42,916 in 2025 and 45,273 in 2026. That's a post-pandemic high, and actually above the 2019 figure of 44,054, so at the very least, the story isn't "nobody applies to university in Hong Kong anymore."

Two things stop me leaning on that too hard for reassurance, though. First, "applicants" isn't the same as "fresh Secondary 6 graduates." JUPAS applications include people applying on an earlier year's HKDSE result: repeaters, gap-year reapplicants, people who started a degree, left, and came back through JUPAS a second time. I don't have a fresh-versus-repeat split for JUPAS specifically, so I can't say how much of the 2025–2026 rebound is new candidates rather than returning ones. Second, this total still says nothing about NCS applicants in particular; I still don't have that breakdown, or the per-university one.

One more possible explanation, ruled out: is any of this down to the School Nominations Direct Admission Scheme (SNDAS), a pathway that's grown alongside JUPAS in these same years? Not in any obvious way. SNDAS isn't actually separate from JUPAS: nominees must hold an active JUPAS application and list their SNDAS programme among their JUPAS choices; the application is only pulled from the JUPAS system once an offer is accepted. It's also been running since the 2022 entry year, admitting a fairly steady 100–140 HKU students across every year in this comparison, which makes it an unlikely explanation for a swing that only shows up after 2023.

What's still missing

Here's what would actually settle this, and what I don't have:

  • The other seven UGC-funded universities' NCS admission numbers for the same years, to see whether the decline is specific to HKU or shared across the whole sector.
  • NCS-specific application or candidate numbers, not just admits, to see whether fewer NCS students are applying in the first place or whether roughly the same number are applying and fewer are getting in.
  • A fresh-versus-repeat breakdown of JUPAS applicants, to know how much of the 2025–2026 rebound in the overall pool is new Secondary 6 graduates rather than returning candidates.

Any one of these would turn this from a pattern worth flagging into an actual answer.

So, should we be worried?

Cautiously, yes, but probably not for the reason the headline number suggests on its own. Nothing here shows HKU turning away non-Chinese-speaking applicants, and I'm taking HKU at its word that 33 is genuinely the highest among the eight funded universities.

What's worth sitting with is narrower. The number fell by two-thirds in three years. HKU described every one of those three years with the same reassuring sentence, worded so it would read the same whether the number went up or down. And as far as I can tell, nobody outside HKU is tracking the other seven universities closely enough to say whether this is a citywide story or one specific to HKU. That gap, not the 33 itself, is the thing actually worth being uneasy about.

A note on the data

Everything above comes from HKU's own English-language admissions press releases, read one by one. Two things kept the read honest: HKU's own numbers cross-check against each other. The 2020 release says that year's 78 was 22% more than the year before, which implies 64, exactly the figure stated in the 2019 release. The 2016 release says that year's 57 was an increase of 78% from the year before, which implies 32; that's where the 2015 figure in the chart above comes from, since there's no 2015 release with an NCS figure in it at all.

2017 is the one real gap. I couldn't find a press release from HKU covering that admissions cycle, on their site or anywhere else, so that year is left out rather than guessed at.

Sources, in order:

  1. "HKU JUPAS main round offer results", HKU, 8 August 2016.
  2. "HKU continues to take in the majority of HKDSE top scorers with diverse interests and wide range of academic pursuits", HKU, 6 August 2018.
  3. "HKU admission standards the highest in Hong Kong", HKU, 5 August 2019.
  4. "4 top scorers achieving 5** in 7 subjects admitted to HKU", HKU, 13 August 2020.
  5. "'Every trade has its master': HKU cultivates elite students for all walks of life", HKU, 12 August 2021.
  6. "HKU admits 16 President's Scholars with average DSE scores over 42 in best five subjects", HKU, 9 August 2022.
  7. "HKU Admits Top DSE Candidates, Embraces Diverse Talent Development", HKU, 9 August 2023.
  8. "HKU admits all-round elites, nurturing diverse global talent", HKU, 7 August 2024.
  9. "HKU champions whole-person education and attracts visionary talent in innovation", HKU, 6 August 2025.
  10. "HKU Admits Over Half of Top 1% HKDSE Talents, Leading the Way in Talent Admissions for AI and Innovation Programmes", HKU, 5 August 2026.
  11. "JUPAS Application Statistics", JUPAS, live statistics page (applicant totals, 2012 to 2026), accessed August 2026.

← Back to all writing